EB1911 attribution edit

Although the footnotes use {{EB1911}} and not {{Cite EB1911}}, I think the former is justified because the text is only slightly modified from the source material, mostly to modernize it. David Brooks (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Odd that kith and kin, birthplace, hometown are all lacking in the herein article. edit

Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.184.220 (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply