Pied imperial pigeon is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The distribution section in this article contradicts both the IOC (who's taxonomy we use) and the Handbook of the Birds of the World, neither have the migratory population of Cape York Peninsula and the Top End in Australia in this species. Sabine's Sunbirdtalk 19:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
You are right. It also ignores the article on D. spilorrhoa. The range given here for Australia to New Guinea refers to D. spilorrhoa, not to D. bicolor. I can only presume that the one inserting it still considers there two to be conspecific. I am removing the sentence concerned. Ptilinopus (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
