Talk:Picture to Burn/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

My first impression of this article is that it is of good size, and of reasonable quality.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lede is excellent. I think country music should be changed to country in the 'Composition' section. I really don't understand the sentence 'Swift's boasts with big vocals that span two octaves, from G3 to C5'.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The GAC link does not link to the blog post that is being referenced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall a good article, but I think the above should be addressed before I pass this. Toa Nidhiki05 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I have made a few changes and since Ipodnano's busy in real life, I'd be happy to address the remaining issues, if there are any. Novice7 (talk) 11:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Alright, my concerns are addressed, so I'm promoting this. Congrats! Toa Nidhiki05 13:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Novice7 (talk) 04:29, 15 October 2011 (UTC)