Talk:Phytosociology

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Discussion header edit

The firts report was partial, Phytosociology is, among the Scientific community, largely discussed as a major geobotanic approach. The article may be developed with the different arguments that are concerned.

I am afraid that it exists different opinions about that. Hiding the debate is making a report partial. Some changes are reverted. And please, sign your posts...89.130.46.172 (talk) 23:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC) JBBReply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Phytosociology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply