Talk:Physical ontology
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Rewrite
editI don't even know where to begin. I can understand if English is one's second language (English is my second language as well), but the egregious grammar, misspellings (and use of non-words), and incoherent rambling found on this page is by far the worst I've come across on Wikipedia. I think it really damages the credibility of the Wikipedia community when something like this remains posted for so long (after has survived countless edits).
I originally thought I could just fix the grammar and punctuation issues (BTW: in what language is it normal to pad quoted phrases with spaces?) and bring the quality of article up to Wikipedia article. But, by the time I'd finished the first paragraph, I began to see that the entire preface was nonsense. So I went ahead and blanked the preface, thinking that the rest of the article wouldn't be as bad. But it's the exact same incoherent rambling with no real substance.
Rather than blanking the entire page, I thought I'd leave it up to someone with a little more patience to sift through this ungodly mess and pick out what flyspeck of relevant info it contains. --71.104.232.71 (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
It's incomprehensible gibberish. I'll often make small corrections to articles if I see spelling or grammatical errors, but I simply wouldn't know where to start with this one HieronymousCrowley (talk) 19:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Indeed, this whole page reads like someone's pet-project. If no one raises a serious objection, I'll redirect this page to Physicalism. T of Locri (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- You didn't, but I have. I would have redir to ontology but I've followed your suggestion instead William M. Connolley (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)