Talk:Phreatic zone

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment stubs on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with this assessment, please:

Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
Remove the stub template from the article.

Pic - capillary fringe

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The capillary fringe article declares tht usage is divided, between specialisms, as to whether the capillary fringe is part of the vadose or phreatic zone. But the diagram here (phreatic zone) shows the fringe unambiguously as included in the phreatic zone. Can someone amend the pic? (maybe by using straight lines instead of curly brackets to indicate the zones? and using a broken line for the fringe?)

I wouldn’t have a clue how to do this, unfortunately. :-(

- SquisherDa (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic