Talk:Phoronix
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Phoronix Test Suite Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Phoronix Test Suite |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 May 2019. The result of the discussion was merge. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=icon}
Linux distribution screenshots? edit
it offers Linux distribution screenshots? Wow! User:ScotXWt@lk 22:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Keep the sensationalism out of Wikis edit
Lots of this content was written in the style of Phoronix; there was a lot of detail on the owner (which should be kept in his wiki), along with sensationalist language commonly found on the website. Lets just keep the details about the subject in focus. Also, there were several sections dedicated to the rumors and articles written about the site; unless we're going to write about every story the site has published, we should also keep that content out too - otherwise where would we draw the line between important an unimportant?
Lets keep the history about chronological events, if there's agreement that some articles merit specific feature we should add a new section covering them to avoid muddying the history section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.91.134 (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Merge edit
The BLP has sourcing issues in particular, it's largely based on primary sources. Widefox; talk 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Notability edit
Is this really notable? While it has gained some fame for it's benchmarks (and infamy for it's cheapo journalism) within Linux circles, there seems to be very, very little independent third-party coverage. --2001:999:91:286:A61D:EE2:CE18:404C (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2019 (UTC)