This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Most of the content came to the article in this edit which does not cite a source for the content. Since it was from an anon and unformatted there's a good chance it's copyvio or undesirable in some way and I just want to make sure everyone is aware. grenグレン 05:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
If it is copyvio, I would truly love to know where it appeared. I have added a couple of references but am not sure if this notice should yet be removed. --Ph7five 14:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On this edit: What are these English words "standart" and "stoll"? And why are the recent additions sourced to an unpublished master's thesis that doesn't appear in Worldcat? (Jojodesbatignoles?) -- Hoary (talk) 23:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
