Talk:Philosophical Reflections in the Naisadhacarita

Philosophy: Literature / Eastern / Contemporary Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Eastern philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

recommend merge

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't believe Wikipedia criteria for notability have been met by the text (a reprinted Ph.D. thesis) that is the topic of this article. Such evidence would include showing that the text has attracted scholarly attention by non-supervisors/non-evaluators of the thesis. The mentions of the work included in the current article are more akin to advertising.

I'd recommend that the few substantive remarks, namely those arguing that Sriharsha's Naisadhacaritam is nontrivially philosophical, should be incorporated into the main article on Naisadhacaritam, where they would be more helpful. This thesis can be cited there unproblematically as a source on Naisadhacaritam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunyataivarupam (talk • contribs) 23:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Agree, done. Jdcooper (talk) 01:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic