Talk:Philippine adobo
 | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Different types of Philippine Adobo edit
When I learnt to cook I was taught different styles of adobo, mainly based on its regional origin. As correctly statet there is a white adobo. The "usual" adobo is the adobo Tagalog style where in addition to soy sauce and vinegar potatoes and carrots are used. In addition, this adobo keeps some of its sauce. The is the adobo Laguna style, yellowish. There is an adobo Ilocano style where soy sauce and kalamansi juice (instead of vinegar) is used, amongst green chili and nothing else. This is still very different from bifstek Tagalog (also with soy sauce and kalamansi), because the Ilocano adobo has to be cooked until the water (from the pork and the soy sauce) is completely gone, hence this one is oily, only then the kalamansi juice will be added in the end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.83.52.191 (talk) 09:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect Link? edit
I was interested in one of the source links (which was cited several times in the article no less) and clicked it, specifically the one labeled this: "Claude Tayag (March 8, 2012). "The adobo identity (crisis)". The Philippine Star. Retrieved November 7, 2012." (as I write this comment, it is listed as the 8th cited source)
Unfortunately though, that does not appear to be the correct link for that article. I'm not sure what would be, but it's definitely not that one, which appears to be related almost entirely to cigarette taxes, rather than food. I figured I should call attention to this, though I'm not sure what caused the issue; if you click the link, the link itself is referring to an "article" number, but then it forwards to...the wrong article on that site? It's possible the newspaper being cited did some reshuffling of their site's organization/functioning, and that this link got screwed up as a result? In any case like I said I figured I would point it out so someone more familiar with the site/subject in question could address it. 97.102.79.98 (talk) 03:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Request revdel for copyvio edit
Contributor User:Terrence Tan has already been blocked for WP:SOCK, although he seems to still be editing as an IP user -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 07:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Exoticizing language edit
"Exotic" (referring to adobo variants including snake and frog, etc.) is not neutral language (it's not exotic to the people who make those variants!) and displays a perspective bias on the part of the author; could the "variants" section be restructured to present this information without tying it to one person's perspective? 2601:1C2:1B7F:C340:C42B:6ECC:773F:9076 (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Unclear usage of words like Adobo and Adobong edit
I think the terms used should be better described. I was confused as after using Adobo later Adobong appears. What stands the 'ng' ending for? 2001:9E8:A5E4:BF00:9156:E412:F3FB:3773 (talk) 14:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)