Talk:Philip Mirowski

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Autarch in topic External links

cover the other major books edit

This entry would need to cover the other major books, like 'More heat than Light' on the relationship of physics to economics in the nineteenth century, and 'Effortless Economy of Science' and 'Science Bought and sold', which relates SSK to recent attempts to provide an economics of science.

Will see to it one of these days. Next time please sign comment!Robertsch55 (talk) 14:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ergosophy edit

Can you explain the connection of Mirowski to Ergosophy? A Google web search turns up only this page, and a Google scholar search turns up nothing. CRETOG8(t/c) 18:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You are tracking my edits in a negative way and your former comment of me is telling here me that you have a problem in general Please cease and desist this. The article is about energy/physics and the philosophy of energy and economics. That is what the other article is about also. See also is meant as a way to connect people to similar information. Please desist in Wikihounding me. - skip sievert (talk) 18:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please stop making personal attacks. I came to this page because another editor pointed here. I skimmed it, and added the Wikiproject Econ banner, near as I can tell before you edited it. That doesn't give me precedence over you, but that's why the page was on my watchlist. I was "already here", not wikihounding you. As to the actual article content: I ask because (a) as I say, searches turn up no relation between Mirowski and Ergosophy, and (b) as I read this article, Mirowski's writing about cross-fertilization of ideas between physics and neoclassical economics, which (as I read that article) is very different from the ideas of Ergosophy. CRETOG8(t/c) 19:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I refer you to this that Soddy did here, and ask you again to leave me alone, and that means stop following me from page to page making things harder than they have to be. I hope that is clear. - skip sievert (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links edit

The link to the Southern Literary Messenger has been replaced with the relevant link from archive.org, but the discussion referred to in the same line doesn't seem to have been archived - it was crawled on 15 July 2011, but the page was already gone then.Autarch (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply