Talk:Phila (daughter of Antipater)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PD Copy & Paste

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Huge chunks of text in the previous version of the article were clunky and dated, I attempted to cut down on the wordiness of the article and the clunkiness of the sentence structure. It seems to have been copied wholesale from an old encyclopaedia article. Content checking on this article would be greatly appreciated. Also, further revisions to the word choice and grammar should be done. yueni 18:14, 29 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yes, is has been copied wholesale, since the material was fully referenced (follow the notes' links) and Smith's DGRBM is still famous for its solidity. And yes, i have verified it. As for the rewording, my English isn't particulary great, so I left the the old English text. Aldux 18:46, 29 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I edited the article to make the language a little less "1867-ish". Boneyard90 (talk) 11:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic