Talk:Phil Mushnick
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Neutral?
editThere are issues with neutrality here. The article seems to be written by someone in full support of this man's positions. Kjscotte34 (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
"Presently, many are demanding Phil be fired over this racist tirade." Is this appropriate? Wouldn't a better wording be "Presently, many are demanding Phil be fired over what they consider to be a racist tirade"? Not sure if this is worth an edit or not. FF9 (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- What you wrote is better than what's there. But we have to watch out for words like "they", or anything else that could be considered a weasel word. I'll take a look at it later in the day, see if I can rephrase it better if no one else does. Right now it's early and I haven't even finished my first cup of coffee yet. Good catch on that FF9. Kjscotte34 (talk) 12:16, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Ignorance and inaccuracies
edit"The columns—written in a highly personal, muckraking style—cover numerous subjects that attempt to expose hypocrisy in sports, criticize exploitation of sex and "attitude" in sports programming, advocate on the behalf of ticket-holders, and express ignorance and/or inaccuracies."
Isn't the line above saying that his columns display ignorance or am I misreading it? If that's what it's supposed to say, then it's not really neutral, especially not without any citations or attributions. Edit: Never mind. It looks like there was an anonymous edit made in 2016 that went ignored. It used to say "expose ignorance and/or inaccuracies perpetrated by broadcasters."5.107.187.128 (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
"WWF/Vince" - rename this section Professional Wrestling and its fans?
editIt seems to me that since Mushnick is not merely a critic of one company or one promoter but is opposed to the very idea of worked professional wrestling and is hell bent on stigmatising its fanbase as a supposed social class, this section should be renamed as suggested above, to reflect the wide scope of his prejudice.
If there are no replies to this by Friday 5th July, I shall assume this is an uncontroversial suggestion and apply the edit myself.62.190.148.115 (talk) 11:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, it's Friday 5th and no-one has objected so I shall assume everyone is happy with the proposed change. I shall put a mention of this thread in the edit summary so that anyone who wants to change it back can discuss the subject on here.62.190.148.115 (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Neutrality out the window
editWiki’s best authors keeping things “neutral” as usual, I see. Yes, I’m being sarcastic. Calling a sports writer a racist and not backing up at least with facts. This is libel and defamatory. 68.132.105.205 (talk) 23:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)