Talk:Phan Khôi

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ac cording to Neil Jamieson (Understanding Vietnam, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), p. 262), Phan Khoi died early in 1960, not 1959. I'm not sure which is correct. Entenman (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)entenmanReply

Legacy section edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can't quite find the word for what's wrong, but it's somewhere along the lines of being biased, or being written like a promotion. It's written in the style of a encyclopedia and definitely needs to be either re-done, or re-written. It's also lacking any references at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.172.126 (talk) 03:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic