Talk:Phage ecology
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phage ecology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Phage ecology appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 September 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Excellent edit
Excellent page. I've nominated for Did you know. Thanks and regards. --Antorjal 05:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
This article on phage ecology was expanded from a stub during the writing of the first chapter of the edited monograph, Bacteriophage Ecology (forecasted publication date: March, 2008, Cambridge University Press), in order to be cited by that chapter especially as a repository of phage ecology review chapters and articles.
Not necessarily the best idea, as Wikipedia can change all the time. Richard001 (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Example farm edit
I've removed the entire "Further reading" section, which threatened to dwarf the article with its dozens of recommendations. Wikipedia is not a list of books. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Suggestions edit
It may be a good idea to include more information on the relationship between phage and bacteria, as it is so important. Also in the "historical overview" section or in the "studying phage ecology" section I think it would be beneficial to talk about how research into phages has really taken off in recent years. Finally, in the "Phage Ecosystem Ecology" section you mention that ecologists are concerned about how phages impact the carbon cycle. Instead of stopping there, maybe go a little more in depth as it sounds like an important issue. Alombard.9 (talk) 12:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Phage ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120203239/http://www.phage.org/bgnws007.htm to http://www.phage.org/bgnws007.htm#submissions
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016054445/http://www.la-press.com/evolbio05.htm to http://www.la-press.com/evolbio05.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824134023/http://viruses.bluemicrobe.com:80/ to http://viruses.bluemicrobe.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823184018/http://128.146.229.3:80/RIS/RISWEB.CGI to http://128.146.229.3/RIS/RISWEB.CGI
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)