Talk:Petroglyph National Monument

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lmcrabtree.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

I am trying to get the original files from the National Park Service constituting the application for National Monument status, as well as supporting photos. With these in hand I hope to improve the historic content of this site, as per the criticism below.Steven C. Price 18:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Untitled edit

There's absolutely no information about what Tribal peoples created these images, how old they are, almost any of the history... this page is pretty worthless. Unfortunately, I was coming to it to find out more about the monument, so I can't add any of that information. I think that's a little more important than criticizing the city government and using this page as a peace of political propaganda... this page gets an F from me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.128.79 (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Petroglyph National Monument/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This monument is scheduled to be bisected by a four-lane highway in order to allow the mayor of Albuquerque to say that he is doing something about the sprawl caused by his campaign developers. I will try to come back when I have more time to write up a discussion of this controversy. Meanwhile, here is a discussion of the controversy, the first reasonably coherent one I can find. There are surely others though; the story has had coverage here and ya, this is not the best source as it is a personal page and liable to a) be questioned as to accuracy and b) become abandoned. If anyone is interested in researching this before i can get to it, search terms would be Martin Chavez, Paseo del Norte Extension and West Mesa Albuquerque Pueblo ancestors and Apache traditions. There is no doubt coverage at www.alibi.com and on The Albuquerque Journal website, which is unfortunately limited to subscribers. Try the Albuquerque Tribune.

Last edited at 10:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 02:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

"Other controversies" section edit

Most of the "Other controversies" section seems to have been copied verbatim or nearly verbatim from a PEER press release. More sources, potentially with differing points of view, should be added to ensure that this section is not one-sided (see WP:NPOV). The section may also need to be rewritten to avoid plagiarism unless PEER has released the press release into the public domain or under a Wikipedia-compatible license (see WP:COPYPASTE). The last paragraph of the section may also need updating. Tralala0 (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Taking it under my wing edit

Hi guys! I recently joined Wikipedia to start editing pages for a class project and I decided to work on this article because I live very close to this monument and grew up basically next door to it. This subject has a lot of meaning and background to me, so I am trying to do my best to make this article better. I've started adding more information to the page about the monuments geologic history and cultural significance. I hope to add more information as i discover more sources. Additionally, i am aware of the major bit of plagiarism within the controversies section, and I plan to do my best to rectify it in the future with more edits as i find more reliable sources. Wish me luck. If anyone has any comments or disagreements with what I have written so far, feel free to edit and add your own content as well. I look forward to hearing more from you on the talk page! Happy editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmcrabtree (talkcontribs) 06:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Petroglyph National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply