This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
A fact from Petit Pont appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,000 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Petit Pont in Paris, France has been destroyed at least 13 times since its construction in the Roman era?
Interesting . . . but the chronology of this article seems to have got somewhat garbled. You might want to fix it. Awien (talk) 00:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Based on the numbers given in the article it appears that Petit Pont has been destroyed some 20 times. I feel that the statment that the bridge was destroyed 11 times before being built of stone in 1175 is the source of the discrepancy. Unfortunately, I have neither the sources cited in the article nor the French needed to review the matter. Perhaps someone with more resources than I could review this issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.163.9 (talk) 00:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
