Talk:Peterhouse, Cambridge/GA1

GA Review

I believe that this article is far too short of GA right now.

1. There are not enough references. More than half the article is unsourced, as are most of the "history" "buildings and grounds" section. "Famous Petreans" is unsourced entirely.
2. References are not formatted with citation templates.
3. Subheaders in "Buildings and grounds" are not formatted with level 3 headers as they should be.
4. Stubby subsections in the same section.
5. Overall, it seems like it could use a copy edit to tighten up the prose a bit. "Chapel" section has about seven sentences in a row beginning with "the", among other things.

Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 11:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)