Talk:Peruvian cruiser Lima
Latest comment: 9 days ago by Simongraham in topic GA Review
 | Peruvian cruiser Lima has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 30, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Peruvian cruiser Lima/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 01:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 21:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I look forward to your comments. simongraham (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Image properly licensed
- Armed with two 6 in (152 mm) guns, on commissioning, the cruiser was the flagship and largest vessel in the Peruvian fleet. In 1901, the armament was upgraded. awkward
- Reworded.
- Link Ecuador
- Added.
- Does the ship have any kind of armor? If not, then she's an unprotected cruiser.
- The sources have no detail about armor. Updated the links.
- Fix the draught figure in the main body; the figures for length and beam don't match between the infobox and main body
- Fixed and referenced.
- Any idea why such a lengthy amount of time between completion and service entry?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Added a bit of explanation.
@Sturmvogel 66: Thank you for this review. Please take a look at my edits and tell me if there is anything else. simongraham (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)