Talk:Perkiomen Bridge Hotel

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original date edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article, as found, simply stated 1706. I added one source for 1689 and a link to the application which says 1706 "despite the sign". I'm assuming this refers to a marker somewhere that gives the earlier date.

It seems that local papers prefer the earlier date. The cite I used was from the 2010 auction. This Inquy article (from the 2007 sale) also uses 1689, along with a brief bit of history that supports this earlier dating. I'm not sure where the Historic app got the 1706 or how it discounts the earlier date. I'm thinking the article should probably use the earlier date with the later date being relegated to a parenthetical remark (essentially the opposite of what I've just established). Thoughts? - SummerPhD (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Auction edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not thrilled with the inclusion of the 2010 auction. The Hotel has changed hands, IIRC, numerous times over the past few decades. While I feel some discussion of this (and the periodic floods) seems warranted, I don't know that we'll find reliable sources discussing this. With the numerous "This-time-for-sure!" attempts to make a go of it, I don't know that this one recent sale merits inclusion. - SummerPhD (talk) 21:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic