Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 December 2021 and 12 January 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Adrienne Workman. Peer reviewers: Studentdoc2022.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

- There is a lot of valuable information in here, great job - I appreciate that this article is written in a straight-to-the-point style. However, I think it could use some extra filler sentences for ease of reading. For ex, a sentence to introduce what you will discuss next, or a sentence to describe the significance of a piece of evidence, or some brief description on terminology (like embryologic lacunae) etc etc. - I also think perhaps an overview paragraph to give some statistics (prevalence) and introduce the topic could be helpful. - I think it could be interesting to discuss the significance of pericardial cysts if you can find information on this. Such as: are there complications of cysts? Why does it matter if you have one? Are patients worked up for these or are they incidental findings? - Your source of info is an open access review which is great. Are there any other reliable sources on the topic that you can find? - You discuss findings on imaging. Is there one form of imaging that is preferred to detect this? Is there an algorithmic approach to working this up clinically? - I am not sure if there is any treatment or management for pericardial cysts but it would be worth mentioning if there is. Even if it is just frequent monitoring, I think you could add a section on treatment and just mention that so the audience knows you considered it. Otherwise I think you do a good job covering the basics!Studentdoc2022 (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply