Talk:Percy Maxim Lee

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 June 2023 by reviewer Bradv (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Copyright problem removed edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-2002-11-12-0211112397-story.html documents.alexanderstreet.com/d/1002968551. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

For editor considering resubmitted article edit

Sources:

The new version complies with the recommendations in the wikipedia article on reliable sources, which says:

Reliable sources are those with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. They tend to have an editorial process with multiple people scrutinizing work before it is published. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources. Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and news coverage (not opinions) from mainstream newspapers.

The sources are:

The New York Times - the national paper of record

Stuhler, Barbara (2000). For the Public Record: A Documentary History of the League of Women Voters. Westport CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780313253164. - Barbara Stuhler is an academic, faculty member and former assistant dean of Continuing Education and Extension at the University of Minnesota. Wikipedia says of the publisher of this book: "Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. (GPG), also known as ABC-Clio/Greenwood (stylized ABC-CLIO/Greenwood), is an educational and academic publisher (middle school through university level) which is today part of ABC-Clio." So, this is a reference work published by a reputable publishing house specializing in academic and educational works.

The Anniston Star - the flagship paper of the Consolidated Publishing Company, well-known in the 1940's and 1950's for being one of only a few liberal-leaning Southern newspapers.

Washington Evening Star - for most of its existence, the newspaper of record for Washington DC.

US Government Printing Office - This is a primary source. The reference itself provides the actual words of Percy Maxim Lee at a Senate hearing, but the wikipedia article simply asserts that she testified before the committee. The citation supports the fact that she testified. Possibly it would be interesting also to add something of what she said. According to the following quote from Identifying and using primary sources, this should be a valid use of a primary source

"Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be used. Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such as when you are supporting a direct quotation."

The Free Library - I don't know whether this is a good source or not. It could be deleted without any damage if not. The page quotes a League of Women Voters retrospective on Percy Maxim lee, which also might not be the greatest source on a League president. However, it seems perfectly reasonable to use this is documentation that she testified before the Senate against McCarthy, but that fact is already documented by the record of the hearing mentioned above.

Alexander Street - once again, this is primary material, in this case a letter written by Percy Maxim Lee to Florence Kitchell. This is to support a direct quotation, which is a valid use of a primary source.

Hartford Courant - the wikipedia article on this says its the largest daily newspaper in Connecticut and the oldest continuously published newspaper in the US. That doesn't really tell us how good a source it is. Also, this is an obituary, and obituaries are frequently written by families - fact-checking may not be extensive. This is in support of material that I think is interesting but not really necessary to the article. If the reviewer thinks it should go, that's fine with me.

Copyright violations:

All were removed by Nthep on Jan 8

I have rewritten the article to avoid the copyright violations where it was important to include material that had been removed.

Add topic