Talk:Pepco

Latest comment: 3 years ago by ImprovedWikiImprovment in topic Requested move 15 October 2020

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 15 October 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved; no consensus to move. (non-admin closure) --IWI (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply



PepcoPepco (energy company) – There is a number of companies with similar names, notably a store chain with about 1500 locations across Europe Andrei (talk) 10:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom and create a dabpage. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. No other article needs to use the title, and there's already a dab page. (But if it were to be moved, it should be back to Potomac Electric Power Company per WP:NATURAL.) - Station1 (talk) 23:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose at this point I would say that the 125-year-old utility company serving the Washington, D.C., area is still the primary topic. The store chain is growing quickly, but currently I don't see evidence that we need to make a move at this time. CThomas3 (talk) 23:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.