 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Pictures edit
Given his age at the time, would it be more appropriate to have an older picture of Andreotti? Should a picture of Forlani be added as well? Bergmanucsd (talk) 15:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Bergmanucsd
Not objective edit
"The coalition was doomed to a quick end" should list reasons for why it was doomed. Bergmanucsd (talk) 23:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Bergmanucsd
References/Reasons needed edit
"It was litigious" as describing the nature of the coalition should give examples or a source/citation that lists such examples. Bergmanucsd (talk) 23:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)bergmanucsd
Infobox edit
Please note the discussion at Talk:Historic Compromise#Infobox that concerns this article as well. --RJFF (talk) 10:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Votes Ranking edit
It does not make sense to list this as 1st as in receiving the most votes. This was a collection of parties that together pooled their votes to achieve a majority, so of course the grouping would be first.Bergmanucsd (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Bergmanucsd