Talk:Pension Protection Fund

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pension Protection Fund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061002043202/https://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/420054_ppf_leaflet_v10a.pdf to http://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/420054_ppf_leaflet_v10a.pdf
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061002060827/https://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/news-details.htm?id=4488 to http://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/news-details.htm?id=4488

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Suggested PPF updates

Hello. I work for a PR agency called Lansons, working on behalf of one of our clients the Pension Protection Fund (PPF). We’ve reviewed the PPF’s Wikipedia page and have spotted a number of factual inaccuracies that we would like to suggest changes for. We have references for them.

We're engaging as a member of the Wikipedia community having signed the official agency/Wikipedia agreement set out here Wikipedia:Statement_on_Wikipedia_from_participating_communications_firms. This means we adhere to the guidelines, most importantly understanding we have a conflict of interest, meaning we let members of the Wikipedia community decide (or not decide) to make changes for us. Would somebody without COI be able to work with us please to make changes?

The first change we would like to suggest is the Chairman of the Pension Protection Fund is changed to Arnold Wagner, who has replaced Lady Barbara Judge. You can find a third-party reference for this announcement here [1]

We would also suggest changing the word ‘pensioners’ in the first sentence to ‘members’ as the PPF doesn’t just protect people who have already retired, but protects 11 million people who belong to defined benefit pension schemes. Almost half of its 225,000 members are ‘deferred’ members who have not yet retired. We would suggest referencing this Government source [2] for the change.

We have some other changes we would like to suggest and can list a few suggestions out soon. Many thanks. MichaelPWhite (talk) 17:21, 01 August 2016 (UTC)

Since posting the above message in Summer last year we've also contacted the WikiProject Finance group and an editor, sadly without getting a response. So we've made the two factual changes above to the page and are clarifying this here for transparency. We'll continue to make factual changes when required, and will of course keep our activities noted here. (MichaelPWhite (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC))

Thank you for your factual updates and for doing your best to avoid COI. Lena Key (talk) 11:36, 24 December 2023 (UTC)