Talk:Pennsylvania Railroad 5550

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	November 24, 2018

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Photo of Tender/Edit Request 11/16/2017

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Would it be worth adding a photo of the aquiared tender to the article? Two images of the tender can be found in the links below me.

https://prrt1steamlocomotivetrust.org/station/image/catalog/IMG_4761.jpg

http://www.trainweb.org/wnyrhs/Images/md6659fullside.jpg

--JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 21:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Blockdoc for adding a picture of the "Coast to Coast" 16 wheeled tender to the article. --JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 20:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well that stinks! The photos were removed apparently for copyright reasons and they were used without permission from the T1 Trust. Hopefully, similar pictures will be uploaded to the article eventually. --JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 20:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

My hope is to eventually include those. If I ever get around to seeing the tenders and such, I'll take the photos myself. --MatthewAnderson707 (talk) 03:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cost and completion goals

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the last couple of days I reverted two good-faith comments on the estimated completion status of the locomotive. In the first case an ISP editor raised a question on how it was deemed "43% complete". The T1 Trust, on their web page and in other sources, bases this on weight. The second reversion made concerned a comment by another ISP editor that it was hoped that the various smaller components needed to complete the locomotive do not drive up the overall cost.

It is certainly true that nuts, bolts, cotter pins, shims etc. will be needed to put things together but as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia we have to support our statements with reliable sources. We have to refrain from making unsourced statements or editorializing in an article. A reader has to be able to find objective and neutral information on the project's progress. We cannot have it cluttered with subjective commentary like, "hope they don't have cost overruns", "can't wait to see it", "the money would be better spent on the K4", etc. Blue Riband► 16:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic