Progress

edit

This will get done in time, so please hang on. For at least, a week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFlyman (talkcontribs) 20:11, February 23, 2010‎

Does this stub really have enough information in it to justify a separate article?

edit

Apart from the paragraph on the restoration, the remainder of the article is general details that are already covered in the main article on the GG1. I would suggest that the information on 4935 could be merged into the main article. KirksKeyKard (talk) 13:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I've added several additional sources and information. The 4935 is the best-preserved GG1 because of the 1977 restoration, and there's rather more information about its history available than for perhaps any other GG1 except #4800. I think it's pretty clear at this point that it meets the GNG. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply