Talk:Pejar Dam

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Pejar Dam is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Pejar Dam is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Dams Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

I've heard that the council was pressured into releasing dam water into the Wollondilly River to feed the Warragamba Dam to help assist Sydney's water supply. Is this rumour true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.21.107 (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2007

db-spam tag edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have added a db-spam tag because I think this article is little more than a mouthpiece for anti-Pejar Dam activists. Biscuittin (talk) 11:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pejar Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081012151606/http://groups.google.com.au:80/group/Goulburn-Water/web/pejar-pipeline to http://groups.google.com.au/group/Goulburn-Water/web/pejar-pipeline

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pejar Dam/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

As far as i know, Pejar has never been Goulburns water supply, it was used by the council as a means of conveying the message about the drought, and to try and gain funding for a water pipe.

Last edited at 03:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 02:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic