Talk:Pearcy murders
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Parkwells in topic No support for 2009 controversies
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pearcy murders article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scale
editNo press coverage indicated this was the most severe case of related murders in the state, despite five people having been killed in the burglaries. Suggests considerable violence in the state.Parkwells (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
I removed this earlier and agree with the removal by another editor. Basically it's not significant enough to meet WP:UNDUE - if Stix's comments had been publicised, maybe then. Doug Weller (talk) 16:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
No support for 2009 controversies
editDeleted category of "Controversies in 2009" because the article did not appear to support that. A new trial being ordered in an appeals case is not a substantial enough controversy to merit inclusion. Parkwells (talk) 18:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)