 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 April 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
After searching, I see that Pear Deck is a notable piece of software. Please fill in a stub's worth of information, and a few sources to avoid deletion. superβεεcat 19:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Note that I've move User:Rubychili2005's article Peardeck here. - superβεεcat 20:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- While short, I don't think this article meets Speedy A7, because: "Any statement which plausibly indicates that additional research (possibly offline, possibly in specialized sources) has a reasonable chance of demonstrating notability is a claim of significance." A simple G-Search shows this is not the case. I think a Prod, or AfD would be more appropriate, if the author fails to expand and source. superβεεcat 21:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
AfD edit
- Does not fit WP:NOTABILITY and should be deleted. 209.82.165.136 (talk) 18:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)