Talk:Peace and conflict studies
Latest comment: 3 months ago by 89.191.245.148 in topic Strategic Foresight Group
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peace and conflict studies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
sources edit
pls do not conflate journalistic attacks on individuals or on the general subdiscipline with the scientific work and arguments being produced in peer reviewed material. It is shoddy. Detailed refs pls from peer reviewed material where nec to keep material live. agreed??
Strategic Foresight Group edit
In the article, the work of the Strategic Foresight Group is highlighted twice. This seems a bit to much given that
- the article gives a general overview of the field,
- in most cases, the work of prominent scholars is only referred to,
- the Strategic Foresight Groups seems not to be of forefront significance (e.g. is not listed in the 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index).
Thus, I would delete both passages. What do you think? -- W.pseudon (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Pohui 89.191.245.148 (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)