Talk:Payzone

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Guliolopez in topic Split proposal

Untitled edit

After discussion with [Nyttend] I have resurrected this page and added further references, I hope this is okay. I will change any wording that breaches copyright immedaitely. Either leave a message here or on my talk page RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 14:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Payzonelogo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Payzonelogo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Payzonelogo.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Advertisment Flag edit

I have removed the "corporate" text and taken the flag off, I hope this is okay. I will expand the history section once I find a decent timeline. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Payzone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

other meaning in geologic exploration edit

http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/Terms/p/pay.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itu (talkcontribs) 13:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit request edit

This article holds incorrect information about Payzone as a group. Payzone UK no longer part of the Payzone group which covers Ireland, Germany, etc. We'd like to remove reference to Payzone UK as part of the Payzone Group. Payzone UK Ltd is not a subsidiary of Duke Street Capitol. It now has different owners, therefore the key people for Payzone UK are incorrect.

Edit request edit

The information in this article is incorrect. The website link doesn't work. Please can it be updated. The post should refer to Payzone Ireland. Payzone UK is a totally separate business, has different owners and website address - www.payzone.co.uk

All references to Payzone UK need to be removed from this post. Vanessalittler11 (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Done jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Split proposal edit

This article is about two different companies and previous edits and references reflect the ambiguity and messiness of trying to keep this in one article. The article is difficult to fix as it stands and needs to separate out the two companies. I suggest we split this into two articles one for each company. I did a draft of each of these based on previous edits as draft:Payzone (United Kingdom) and draft:Payzone (Ireland) as a base for further edits and added a disambiguation page. There was some resistance to this as the change was reversed but the article is still a mess. Sargdub (talk) 23:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment. @Sargdub: Given that this thread is open quite a while, I was hoping to weigh in and help progress the proposal. I note, however, that the two drafts (which seem to form a basis and to provide context for the proposal) have since been deleted. As expired drafts. Are you still proposing the split? (If this title is covering two different, distinct and separate companies [with no connection other than a similar name], then - as you note - they shouldn't be covered under the same title. But I'm not sure if that's the case...) Guliolopez (talk) 12:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply