Talk:Paul Strisik
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Davidwr in topic How much of the recently added material should be kept?
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Davidwr (talk · contribs) on 10 November 2020 with the comment: Page and previous revisions are too promotional. While "deletion is not cleanup" if this is not cleaned up soon, it would be better for it to be removed until someone requests that it be restored so they can improve it. WP:REFUND if the page is deleted, or simply remove the "dated prod" template if the page has not been deleted yet. Notice given at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts&oldid=987998688#Paul_Strisik_is_a_bit_promotional,_I_am_proposing_it_for_deletion It was contested by DGG (talk · contribs) on 2020-11-13 with the comment: uncertain about notable -- pls use afd |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How much of the recently added material should be kept?
editA new account added some new material to the page. Some of it is promotional and should be removed, some is probably worth keeping.
Also, the editor changed the tone of some sentences to be less encyclopedic, so I put {{tone}} at the top of the page.
I'm hoping this comment will get the attention of experienced editors familiar with the topic who can make a better decision than me about what's worth keeping and what isn't. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)