Talk:Paul Manafort/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Manafort's height is cut short in this page?
Manafort is 5'11" not 4' 11" as shown on this page. An obvious typo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.40.224.105 (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Manager v. Chairman
The article says that Manafort was hired as Trump Campaign manager, but resigned as campaign chairman. It doesn't seem to explain the difference between those roles.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Removal of sentence in lede.
Hi - I removed a sentence that was inserted into the lede, and my edit was reverted with the reason "sourced text". I don't think this is a sensible reason to revert - that sentence really doesn't belong in the lede, is from a DNC member (so not a purely factual statement). You can find many other statements from similar people on both sides saying questionable things about either the truth or falsity of his connections to Ukraine/Russia. Really I think the charges speak for themselves. If someone wants to re-add something like that to the first section of the page, I recommend finding a more neutral source. Politico is fine, but the person they're quoting is not a fact witness by any stretch. 189.217.82.171 (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Milhouse-the-mighty.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Manafort blocked from leaving country
Manafort blocked from leaving country and passport revoked.
Also:
"A Republican-led Senate group found that Manafort was a “grave counterintelligence threat,” according to USA Today. He had longstanding ties to people affiliated with Russian intelligence and had a willingness to share information with them during the 2016 presidential race.
The panel found that Manafort’s presence on the campaign created opportunities for Russian intelligence to have influence over and inquire information about the Trump campaign."[1]
Citation overkill
Some of this article simply has too many citations. See WP:Citation overkill. Let's cut them down a bit. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Lead is too long
The lead should be an INTRODUCTION to the article and a SUMMARY of its most important contents. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 16:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Your lead is far too short and leaves out significant mention of important content in the body of the article. See WP:Lead and WP:CREATELEAD. Note that I am NOT saying that some pruning might not be warranted, but your edit didn't do that. It moved long-standing summary content out of the lead.
- Such changes to the lead are far too important to be made without discussion and consensus, so please suggest some changes and we'll see if they gain traction here. Tell us which sentences might be pruned without violating LEAD. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Why no mention of Mr Manafort's book giving his view of events?
Why is their no real mention of Paul Manafort's book giving his view of events - the article appears to be entirely written by enemies of Mr Manafort, and the only sources given are hostile ones such as "The Atlantic" magazine. No sources on Mr Manafort's side of the conflict are given. A reference work (which is what Wikipedia claims to be - it states it is not partisan) should give links to both sides of a debate, and allow the reader to make up their own mind.2A02:C7E:1CD7:8C00:6CCC:61F5:73C4:B388 (talk) 09:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)