Talk:Paul Jaworski

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Guy Macon in topic Request for Comments

Nominated for deletion edit

This article was nominated for deletion on 180106. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

Speedy delete edit

I don't understand the speedy delete. The subject seems notable an important first in the history of the armoured car and crime. There is a good link to a reliable source. OK so its short, but maybe theres not much more to say. --Salix alba 02:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The original article was a one line about a Paul Jaworski born 1989 and no other info. It was speedy deleted of course. This is now the proper article. I've even removed the AfD. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

It make take that, the vote has already finished as speedy delete, so the page could disapear any moment now. I've copied the text to Talk:Armoured car. --Salix alba 02:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Contesting Speedy Delete edit

I've placed a hang on tag for speed delete. 1) He seems to be mentioned in this book: Amazon Book. 2)He's also mentioned here, which as far as I can tell is a genuine news story. The Great Detroit News Payroll Robbery So at the moment, I've think it's very hastey to delete it. Englishrose 10:12, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Footnote edit

I found the info that backs many of the article's claims (especially a source for an actual conviction for this particular gang member) in the external link, so I deleted it as an external link and added it to the article in a couple of places where it fits. But I know there's a way to combine footnotes 3 and four into just footnote 3, displayed twice. However, I don't know what that way is. If someone else will do it, I'll learn. Thanks in advance. David in DC (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

  • Endorse merge Pustelnik has done a lot of good work here. I have one quibble, but it doesn't affect my endorsement of the proposed merger.
I question whether the serial killers category is fair. Habitual maybe, but serial? His killings weren't part of a connected series. FWIW, I think serial killer should be reserved for the Ted Bundys, Jeffrey Dahmers and Hillside Strangler-types of the world.
But like I said, small beer. Kudos for admirable work to turn two weak stubs into one, much-better article. David in DC (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'll accept that as a valid point. He did admit to killing seven people, however. He does not quite fit the serial killer definitions, but comes close. I removed the category. Pustelnik (talk) 19:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Endorse merge might aswell go right ahead with the merge. --Salix (talk): 20:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Merged, with some clean up. I couldn't resist the link for Father Pat O'Brian. Pustelnik (talk) 13:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ohio ? edit

His major robberies were in Detroit, and just outside of Pitssburgh, but I can't find anything in between, like Ohio. Why is he in the "from Cleveland" category? Pustelnik (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comments edit

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Reply