Talk:Paul George/GA3

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anonymous1261 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I may not review the criteria in a specific order. Please understand.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Please check Words to watch. There are some words like 'but' and 'despite'. Not all uses are wrong, but please correct ones like this: "During the game, he forced a career-high 5 steals and finished with a team-high 16 points; however, despite his effort the Bulldogs lost, 85–68."

   There's only 2 remaining. It will be passed once these two are fixed:

   1. Despite his accomplishments, George was not considered a major prospect by colleges.

      George had a game-high eight assists in Game 6, but scored just five points on 2-of-16 shooting.

Since you have finished it, I am passing it.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Now the tool says that 96% copyright of here: [1] but it looks to have copied from wikipedia. I am putting on hold now, please resolve the issue.

   How do I resolve the issue if the website copied from Wikipedia? The website indicates that it was updated on July 1, 2024 and that a full biography can be found on Wikipedia - FiveXdollars — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiveXdollars (talk • contribs) 20:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

   Ok, understood Who am I? Talk to me! What have I done? 10:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Nothing specific here.

5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.