Talk:Paul Eisler

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Say... the article seems to be a straight copy from the source given, which is this BBC site.

Since I wikified it before giving it much thought, I revised this one to avoid plagiarism but I've seen others as well. Do you know which template to flag them with? - EN1-UTE- (Talk) 07:45, 21 May 2024 UTC [refresh] </nowiki> -->Onceler (Talk) (Mail)   02:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
The BBC link doesn't work. If someone could get their hands on the book mentioned at the bottom of the article, maybe this biography could be corrected. Zohair Ahmad (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Done and done! :-) Woz2 (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Eisler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply