Talk:Paul Bew

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 06:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

My recent edits edit

Hi all! I just recently edited the article (you can see my changes here), and I'm still not sure of its accuracy. I have it that Bew is actually called Lord Bew, not Baron Bew. I'm not at all familiar with the whole peerage thing, but he's referred to Lord Bew in my own materials. Also, I removed a bit of the unsourced information, as I couldn't find a cite for it and some of it seemed to contradict the materials I have and have cited. If someone has a cite for the stuff I've removed, please feel free to re-add it. Cheers gaillimhConas tá tú? 06:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Baron is the rank of peerage that he holds, as do all life peers. You would only address him as Lord Bew though, never Baron.Traditional unionist (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paul Bew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply