Talk:Passenger (Powderfinger song)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
Good articlePassenger (Powderfinger song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 5, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 29, 2007.

GA Candidate edit

Got track times. It's ready now. --lincalinca 09:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nominated. — H2O —  09:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

on hold edit

It's mostly OK, but there are some things missing

  • Title of song should be in italics and not with quotes
  • Like the other song, there are some details about the song that need filling out, such as key, time 2/4 4/4 and so forth, and preferably more explanation of the lyrics. More discussion of the raw content is needed
    •   Done... partly. I tried to get some explanations on the lyrics, but other than what we have here, I couldn't come across anything that didn't basically say how much the song rocks (seriously), but nothing else, but I have added the structure key etc info and broken it into its own section. --lincalinca 06:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Do we know more about the business/record label contract info surrounding this song?
    • See Linca's comment below. — H2O —  08:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Do we know sales figures?
    • Don't think so... — H2O —  08:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
      • Australian sales figures aren't housed specifically for publication purposes, so they're not easy to come by. Pretty much all aussie music is in this boat, meaning it's unreasonable to have to list it since it's practically impossible to note. --lincalinca 06:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Some pages need retrieval dates in teh sources.
    •   Done — H2O —  08:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • One of the paras is unsourced.
    • I can't see one now, but I know H2O did add a couple. Is it covered now? --lincalinca 06:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • The copyvio, referencing stuff, NOR is all in order apart from that.

Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'll get to work on the issues, but won't change the italic/quote matter based on my response above. --lincalinca 03:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I got to work on some stuff and now realised it wasn't what you asked for, other than the charts. Anyway, we now also have the awards listed in full. As to the label info surrounding the song, the song falls right in the middle of the group's contract with Polydor-Universal contract, so I think it's rather irrelevant to note. As to content discussion, the trouble with this is that pretty much everything we could find that referred to it is listed, and anything else we list will invariably be original research (we could publish information from my review of their best of from 2004, on which I went into some details of the allegory of the lyric, but that's MY original research, but published from my third party source). Anyway, I'll see what I can do about the key etc etc. --lincalinca 04:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well done, thanks again. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Passenger (Powderfinger song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply