Talk:Pasquier Grenier
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Fritzmann2002 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Pasquier Grenier appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 November 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Fritzmann2002 talk 18:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
( )
Tapestry with the Armorial Bearings and Badges of John Dynham, 1st Baron of Dynham
- ... that Pasquier Grenier sold tapestries to royalty across Europe in the 15th century? Source: Crick-Kuntziger, Marthe (1936). "Le tapissier Pasquier Grenier et l'église Saint-Quentin à Tournai". Revue Belge dilirchéologie et d'Histoire de l'Art. 6: 203–214.
- Reviewed:
5x expanded by DrMedRenArtHistory (talk). Self-nominated at 21:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pasquier Grenier; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Hook is sourced, with source accepted on good faith. Article is recently expanded and long enough, with no evident plagiarism or copyvio issues or any other problems that would keep it from the front page. No QPQ: I'm not sure how to check if the nominator needs one (queried on talk page); if they have fewer than five DYK credits, they don't.QPQ not needed, as this will be a first DYK.
- Image needs a US PD tag, but beyond that, does not show well at small scale at all. Would suggest an alternative (with fewer small-scale patterns) or simply removing. Also suggest cutting "and sold wine too": it dangles a bit at the end and takes away from what is otherwise an excellently punchy hook. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Approved as just edited, without the image. Congratulations and good work on the article. UndercoverClassicist T·C 18:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrMedRenArtHistory (talk • contribs) 19:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Many thanks--I appreciated it!DrMedRenArtHistory (talk) 19:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
