Talk:Parts of a tree

Redirection

This article is identical in coverage to the Morphology section in the tree article. there is no need for a fork of content as the parts of a tree are adequately covered in the parent article, and the article is not of such a size that an article split would be in order. I also note that one other editor User:RHaworth also came to this conclusion, but the redirect was reverted. -- Whpq (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Explained...--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 12:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Links

I have done one link to this artcile from another in Wikipedia, I will try some more...--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 12:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Did another...--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 12:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

And one more from outside as well...--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 12:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge

Please put further discussion at talk:tree#Merge of material from Parts of a tree. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 13:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)