Talk:Partition (song)/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Appears to be a solid article. I'll have this to you within 48 hours Jaguar 18:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Initial comments

edit
  • ""Partition" is a song recorded by American singer Beyoncé for her self-titled fifth studio album (2013)" - I'd write this as "Partition" is a song recorded by American singer Beyoncé for her self-titled fifth studio album released in 2013 - just a suggestion though
  • The lead summarizes the article well, so this passes
  • "The production was handled by Timberlake, Beyoncé, Dean, Boots" - why is 'Boots' under his pseudonym here whereas everybody else mentioned isn't?
  • "I got to the mic, I'm like, 'Oh, press Record'"? - should record be capitalized?
  • "Midway the following year, the writers of Spin magazine placed it at number four on the list of the 57 best songs so far" - this part is unreferenced, and also "midway the following year" sounds like guesswork, could it be pinned down to June/July 2014?
  • The first paragraph in the Synopsis section is unreferenced

References

edit
  • Ref 55 is dead
  • This link is dead too, but I'm not sure where it is used in the article

On hold

edit

Like the last one I reviewed, this is overall a well written and solid article. The concerns above are relatively minor, so I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until everything is addressed. Thanks Jaguar 17:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Close - not listed

edit

I'm sorry to do this, but I'll have to close this due to inactivity. It is such a nice article though, so if all of the above can be addressed please come to me again and I will probably 'quick-pass' it like I did to the inactive Rocket GAN. Thanks Jaguar 16:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply