Talk:Paroedura lohatsara

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Common name edit

This species has no common name of "Party gecko" and any attempt to name it so is a gross violation of ethics within the reptile community.

the name comes from a small business with a very small collection of these animals who considers herself on the forefront of this species conservation when there are many breeders with 5 times the amount.

I URGE anyone that reads this and sees the name of party gecko within the article revert it immeditly.

for more information you can refer to the edit log. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.120.125 (talk) 06:21, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paroedura lohatsara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply