Talk:Parker Hale PDW
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 2601:5:C480:88E0:DAA2:5EFF:FE96:5BB8 in topic Merger proposal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Parker Hale PDW redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merger proposal edit
I propose that Bushman IDW be merged into Parker Hale PDW. The Bushman IDW is unreferenced and has no sources apart of 2 links to US patents. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 01:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. Very similar, if not mostly the same design. Usually, merging into the article of whichever came first would appear prudent (this case, it seems to be the Bushman), but the forerunner in question didn't seem to have left the blueprint/patent phase, and there unfortunately seems to be nearly nothing else sourcing its existence, so fusing with the materialized Parker Hale is agreeable. 2601:5:C480:88E0:DAA2:5EFF:FE96:5BB8 (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)