Talk:Paris Saint-Germain F.C./GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FAC} 13:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

My second GA review. I will place this on hold, as I feel this could be a GA with some work. A nicely-written article. All in all, I'll say that the lede is too long, history section is a bit short and there are some issues to iron out.

I've failed the article due to lack of response from otherwise active nominator. Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest PR} 06:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

General

• Colours. This is not often used in other football articles, I would recommend creating a spin-off article and remove all of the images, save perhaps one or two. Also needs references.
• References.
  • This is very problematic. Many of the references are poorly formatted and needs date, accessdate, author if possible and publisher. I recommend you use the {cite web} template so you remember all the important information.
  • None of the cited books are being referenced in the article. This is a cause for some concern. Also some of the books seem to have self-translated titles, which is not acceptable. Include original title and add the "|language=French" parameter when using {cite book}.

Stadiums

• Needs references, entire sections are unreffed.

Current squad

• The "starting line-up" image caption is unreferenced, and I'll be surprised if you can find a source stating the first XI. Something seems to have gone wrong with the image.

Reserves and academy

• Unreferenced sections

Managers

• I would remove the list of managers and keep the wikilink to "List of managers".

Presidents

• Again, would remove the list, or at least format it properly. Per MosFlag, the French flag should be removed.

Le classique

• Two first sections are unreferenced.

Rivalries

• Please, consider to add new emerging rivalry with Chelsea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:718:1E03:AED2:619A:246E:D9FB:69F5 (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Honours

• See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Clubs for the manual of style. Formatting should be quite different.

Images.

• Often well-captioned, however there are some problems:
  • File:Coupe des Coupes 1996.jpg is a derivative, copyright belongs to trophy-manufacturer.
  • "Crest" section contains a gallery of non-free images, which is discouraged. One or two images should be enough to illustrate the evolution of the crest.

Lead.

• Far too long I must say, see WP:LEAD for recommendation on the lead. Remember, lead = summary of article. I would recommend writing a new summary and stuff in the lead.