This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
These people lived on the Aous river below Vovousa. Hammond in The Ethne in Epirus in and ancient Macedonia writes: In classical times the habitat of the Parauei was on the western flank of the Pindus range in the area reaching Vovousa on the Aous. They were then between the Molossi and the Orestae [..] We can thus understand the epithet "migratory" as applied to the Perrhaebi; for in the winter they went presumably from western Pindus to the Perrhaebi who were settled in north-east Thessaly near the coast But in both maps, which have been peristently put forward on wikipedia by some editors, they appear about 150-200km to the north, near modern Ballaban. I suspect that this article and Perrhaebi have been written mostly with access to snippet search of GBooks. I have full access to JSTOR (but never used it before) because its bibliography mostly doesn't include my field of study. Today, I started verifying some of the Hammond citations (almost all were published in jstor-affiliated journals) in wikipedia and they're either out-of-context or just wrong to the point that I'm 100% sure that whoever wrote that specific article, doesn't have access to the paper h/she has cited except for maybe a snippet on Gbooks. Should I maybe start a merge discussion for these two articles (Parauaea and Perrhaebi)? Your thoughts: @Alcaios:@Future Perfect at Sunrise: ? --Maleschreiber (talk) 22:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply