Talk:Parasite (2019 film)/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 3E1I5S8B9RF7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk · contribs) 18:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A very good article, but several issues need to be addressed and corrected in order for it to get promoted. The sections with issues are listed bellow.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

References from no. 137 to 144 all have unformatted, "raw" url links. Sources no. 95, 96 as well. This needs to be properly formatted, like the rest of the references.

Filming

edit

"The director of photography for the film is Hong Kyung-pyo." No source at the end of this paragraph.

Music

edit

"...the romanisation of names and nouns used are slightly different from those seen in the official English subtitles as translated by Darcy Paquet." The same issue, no source at the end of this paragraph.

Accolades

edit

"being the third film to win both grand prizes after the former and The Lost Weekend." Again, no source at the end of this paragraph.

Critical response

edit

This section just quotes the reviews verbatim. Quote after quote after quote. Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. This needs to be summarized and editorized, with the examples being The Thing, Ghostbusters II and others.

Conclusion

edit

Promoting the article, since the issues have been addressed.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed