Talk:Parapropalaehoplophorus

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worst name ever? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Perhaps it should be noted in the article how ridiculously many genera are part of this name play? FunkMonk (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll take your word for it if there are other genera, but I think maybe the discoverer was just being playful .... it sounds to me like an animal bumping its way around and maybe rolling into a ball. It could be parsed as something like "similar to a very old armored animal". —Soap— 13:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree it's worth mentioning that Propalaehoplophorus, Palaehoplophorus, and Hoplophorus are indeed all actual species. The original paper isn't referenced on this page yet, and it explains the etymology, so I can get on that. Dinoman747 (talk) 07:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic