Talk:Parable of the Olive Tree

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Adri-at-BYU (talk · contribs) has been paid by BYU. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Started Article edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've started this article because other important parables have separate articles, but I couldn't find an article for this one. Given its importance (and its complexity), I'm hoping that other editors will add to this article. RomanSpa (talk) 23:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality Questioned edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article reads like an unabashed missionary tract without any critical notice of Smith's authorship and the 19th-century sources that he could have relied on for information. Nephites and Lamanites are referenced without any mention that they are fictional peoples except among the Mormon faithful. --Taivo (talk) 04:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. This is an article discussing a piece of text and the analysis thereof. We don't have articles on Dickens' novels which continually state the characters are fictional. But my fullest respect to you for making sure we are not corrupted by this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.81.179.41 (talk) 01:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic