Talk:Papal gentleman

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge?

[Untitled] edit

Does not state what role has been since Vatican 2. --Daniel C. Boyer 20:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article should be split into an article on chamberlains and "papal gentlemen". As it stands, it's a mess. Lonietta (talk) 18:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

2010 references to Angelo Balducci and the accomanying scandal regarding allegations of gay sex procurement should not be deleted due to controvery alone. Discuss here as needed prior to reversions.

65.207.69.2 (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 May 2019 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 09:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


Papal GentlemanPapal gentleman – Per WP:CONSISTENCY with Papal chamberlain. Indeed, quite a few sources seem to suggest this is a just as if not a more appropriate name. PPEMES (talk) 22:33, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge? edit

Ought Papal chamberlain be merged into Papal gentleman#History? (Category:Papal chamberlains could still be retained.) PPEMES (talk) 01:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 18:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply